Electrical Contracting, Service Industry and Equipment Technicians

ETU Cracks Down on Site Safety

Posted on 01-8-2016

As part of the ETU’s construction and contracting campaign the union has started to crack down on worksite safety.

As part of this hardline approach ETU Organisers Mick Hopper and Antony Stegic attended a Lend Lease site at Macarthur Square last week where multiple safety breaches were identified. Builder Lend Lease agreed that the identified breaches needed to be rectified and proceeded to shut down a majority of the job until electrical contractor’s Neilson and All Tech fixed the problems.

Even more disturbing was the fact that All Tech had no licensed electricians onsite despite unlicensed overseas labour hire workers continuing to perform work.

On another site at Sutherland Hospital, builder Richard Crookes was forced to halt work after the ETU identified electrical safety breaches. This time the electrical contractor was Grid Electrical who were forces to rectify issues immediately after being instructed to do so by the builder.

On both sites the union raised concerns over amenities as there was not enough room for all workers to use them. After raising concerns both sites have improved amenities by bringing in additional sheds – a win that will benefit all workers on these sites.

If you have any safety concerns or need assistance on-site please contact your site delegate or ETU Organiser.

Members and supporters,

Your EBA negotiating committee met with FXA management on Monday 18th July 2016 in a bid to further progress the EBA claim. Some more progress was made but not enough to get an Agreement completed prior to the expiry of our right to take protected industrial action in accordance with our successful protected action ballot (PAB) which expires on the 30th of this month.

Areas of progress on outstanding issues.

GPS Tracking: The company has agreed to drop their claim for tracking employees. Instead the proposal is that a volunteer group of employees would participate in a pilot / trial program which would assist FXA in developing a model proposal to be put to employees with a view to subsequent implementation being subject to employee acceptance of the model. The ETU noted this progress with the company but made the point that we required some more firm parameters around how the trial would proceed and on what basis subsequent acceptance, if any, would be deemed legitimate.

Travelling Time: The Company has proposed that payment of excess travelling time be paid only after travelling occurs over 35km outside the Technicians nominated district. The proposal is subject to FXA conducting cost / benefit analysis. The ETU made the point that this proposal, notwithstanding the fact that FXA are yet to make a firm offer until they have conducted the cost benefit analysis, is problematic given the dimensions of the Sydney Metropolitan Area and the density of traffic, so such a radius would rarely result in compensation for excess travelling time.

Lack of progress on outstanding issues.

Pay Rise: The company have offered a $2,00 pay rise in years 1 and 2 of the Agreement and $2,300 for years 3 and 4.

Dispute Settlement Procedure (DSP): FXA wish to retain the current DSP which has no provision for invoking of status quo. The ETU, at FXA’s request provided some limiting parameters around which Status Quo would apply but the company still refuses to consider this provision. The ETU maintained our position that without Status Quo the company simply proceeds through a “tick the box” consultative process then implements decisions which have major impact on our members. Subsequent disputes then have less effect because the changes have already been implemented.

As a result of this remaining impasse we made it clear to FXA that we would be forced to activate member’s right to take protected action in accordance with the successful PBA before that right expires on 30th July. As a result a 2hr legal industrial action stoppage of work will occur between the hours of 8:30am and 10:30am tomorrow 28th July 2016. During this time members should attend a stop work meeting to be held at Rosehill Bowling Club, Hassall St, Rosehill. Members should proceed to their allocated job for an 8:30 start as normal then proceed to the above location for the meeting. I have attached the FXA offer in detail for members to consider, the offer will form the basis of discussion at the meeting during which time direction from members will be sought as to whether or not further actions are required. Your attendance at the meeting is critical.

In Unity,

Mark Buttigieg.

"We couldn't have done it without the ETU" – Chris Walker

Electrical contracting company VMH based in Shellharbour went broke while working on a Lend Lease site at Darling Harbour Live. They were also contracted across major sites with state and federal government funding in Sydney. 

Five ETU members were paid zero superanuation for up to a year and also had their wages, accruals and redundancy payments ripped off. The ETU pursued the issue with primary contractor Johnson Controls and Lend Lease Building to ensure that all ETU members recovered their superannuation and other entitlements which amounted to over $60,000.

The ETU became aware of the situation when one of our members, Chris Walker, enquired about his redundancy entitlements after being let go by the company in April. Initially, Chris wanted to know how much redundancy he was entitled to after working there for several years. However, Chris was unaware that the boss tricked him into reducing his wages to 'help the company'. The boss told him he would have to resign from the company first to make it legal to reduce his wages. In fact what the boss did was to steal his notice period and redundancy payments for the years he had worked. It was another example of wages theft!

ETU organisers Stewart Edward, Fred Barbin and Mick Hopper pursued the matter vigorously to ensure all monies owed were paid.

"This example of a company going broke or not paying correct entitlements on major construction sites is now common.” Said ETU organiser Stewart Edward.

“It is important that all workers check the name of the company they are working for and that it is written on their wage slip. Furthermore, it is essential that workers check that their superannuation is actually being paid into their accounts not just written on their wage slips.” Stewart said.

“Non payment of superannuation is an early indicator that your boss may be winding up the company you work for so it is important for workers to be vigilant." Stewart said.

The ETU understands that the individual involved in running this company may also have been involve in seething up another company with different directors to continue tendering on the same construction sites and with the same builders. The ETU will be keeping an eye on the situation in order to protect members.

If you have any concerns about your wages and entitlements you should contact the ETU on 9267 4844 .


As many of you would be aware, on behalf of ETU members at Fuji Xerox around the country the ETU filed an application with the Fair Work Commission for a ballot to take protected industrial action in accordance with the Fair Work Act.

On 30th June 2016 the ballot was declared. The ballot resulted in a 73% participation rate with an overwhelming majority of members voting in favour of all 17 proposed forms of industrial action. The highest yes vote being 99% of participating voters and the lowest being 86%. There is little doubt from this result that members are more than willing to take protected action if necessary. We have 30 days from the declaration to exercise our right to take protected industrial action after which time any actions not taken will lapse and require another ballot.

During the ballot the ETU has continued negotiations with FXA management with some movement but not nearly enough. The last meeting took place on 15 June 2016 and resulted in the following outcomes;


EA/Reps and Bargaining Reps


FXA’s position

$3K increase

Pay increase

$2K increase


Mark B to provide clarification/wording.

Travel Time 30minutes start & finish

Clarification on travel time Clause 38.16.2

No/To review drafted rewording of clause 38.16.2


Status quo DSP

Agreed on to review clause 40 of the current agreement

No Change


12 Month’s as per FXA corporate policy for new starters


EA/Reps and Bargaining Reps


FXA’s position


Walking allowance


Same as current agreement

Vehicle Allowance


No restrictions

Vehicle Allowance Vs Co. Car

No more than 50% of field opp’s employees to have car allowance.

Increase of $2K for the term of the agreement

TS Allowance

Proposed an increase of $1K  for year 1 and year 2, an additional $1K on year 3 and 4 ($2k total over 4 yrs)

GC 45K/ OSG 40K

Minimum pay


4 Year



Work Day (Yes)

Drop Point is working time

It is optional and flexible for employees. Can opt out or FXA review removal if not working

Clarification on Working

Clarification on WA travel time for training Clause  25.2

Agreed on proposed wording for WA


In terms of GPS tracking, FXA maintain their position that they require this implemented. Our constant feedback from members and the position that we have consistently maintained in the negotiating committees is that members are adamantly opposed to the use of this invasive technology tracking their every move.

Negotiations will continue on Monday 18th July. We will then report back on the progress of those negotiations and ask for feedback from you on whether we then proceed to exercise our right to take industrial action prior to the 30 day expiry date of 30 July. Clearly we are at a fork in the road and the ball is now squarely in the court of Fuji Xerox. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact either myself or your workplace delegate.

In Unity,
0417 208 447 / markb@etunsw.asn.au

The ETU has secured more than $2,000 in underpayments for a Sydney based Electrical Apprentice after it was discovered his employer was paying him less than the award rate.

The first year apprentice was employed by Halkat Electrical Service over a period of 8 months where the apprentice was paid at the rate of $9.85 an hour when the award rate for a first year electrical apprentice is $11.07.

Over the 8 month period the electrical apprentice was under paid $1,971 in wages and additional $145 in lost superannuation.

Recently the ETU has drawn a line in the sand in the construction and contracting sectors with a zero tolerance approach to dodgy bosses when it comes to member’s rights, conditions and workplace safety.

ETU organiser Fred Barbin who handled the matter said that it is possible other electrical apprentices could be in the same boat.

“My message to electrical apprentices is join your union, know your rights and double check things because bosses will rip you off at the first possible opportunity.” said Fred.

“This apprentice member eventually got what he was owed but it was only because the ETU got involved and force his employer to pay through legal intervention.”

“In the end the ETU took decisive action by notifying principle contractors on sites where Halkat Electrical Services was engaged forcing the boss to pay the apprentice what he was owed.

“Without the help of the union it is likely that this electrical apprentice would never have got his money which is an example of why it is so important for all workers to join their union.” said Fred.

If you are an electrical apprentice, electrician or electrical worker and you suspect you are not being paid correctly you should contact the ETU on 02 9267 4844 and we have one of our organisers assist you.

Following a stoush with management in mid-May after industrial action, ETU members and the union thought we had secured an in-principle agreement however on closer inspection of managements proposed agreement it became clear that management had attempted to sneak in significant changes that would have seen ETU members out of pocket if their tools were stolen while also leaving members that work “short shifts” worse off.

As a result, ETU members at Chubb Fire and Security attended a mass meeting on the morning of Friday 3 June where negotiations were discussed at length. At this meeting members decided that any previous in-principle deal was off as a result of deceitful management tactics. It was unanimously resolved that members would re-double their efforts to secure an outcome that delivers important items such as protection around the use of labour hire, sub-contractors, domestic violence clause and delegates rights clause.

The negotiating committee is scheduled to meet with management this Friday 1 July after which a further update will be provided for members.

In Unity
Steve Bankes – ETU Organiser

The current dispute with Otis over the enterprise agreement is a lot more in depth than what the company is making out. As there are quite a large number of issues to resolve we have agreed to move the stoppage back to Wednesday in order to try and reach agreement without the need for industrial action.

They have deliberately put all of the focus on the service spread of hours to hide from you that they are still trying to steal more of your conditions.

The following are the points that the Union believe are still not agreed:-

  • SITE PRODUCTIVITY ALLOWANCE: The company want to take the allowance off you when you are undertaking off-site work that is associated with the project. This has never been the case before.
  • “ILLEGITIMATE” ALLOWANCES: Leading Hand allowance is probably the main target here. Over the years the company has offered L/H allowance to employees as an enticement to stay with Otis. This has been due to the FACT that other lift companies pay a higher hourly rate and the only way to compete with that is offer an allowance. This is not an EBA issue and should be dealt with by management internally.
  • TRAINING OUTSIDE OF NORMAL HOURS: We are still unsure on this item. You currently have provisions in the agreement that allow for training outside of normal time at single time. There are strict parameters around this but we still aren’t sure how they want to expand them.
  • INCOME PROTECTION: There has been no agreement reached on Income Protection/Top Up insurance. The company has been quick to use the Victorian agreement when pushing compulsory spread of hour but they refuse to talk about the fact that the Vic’s have Top Up.
  • CASHING OUT RDO’S: This is just another way of pushing you back to a 38hr week. If the company has too much work and need you to work through your RDO’s then they should be offering to pay them out at overtime rates.
  • CASHING OUT ANNUAL LEAVE: We have been rejecting this for ever and a day. Why they would even keep bringing it up is beyond me.
  • TAKING OF ANNUAL LEAVE: There is no way in the world we would ever accept that the company can direct you to take annual leave when they haven’t planned enough work. This would lead to members being forced to take a week off in the middle of winter and then having none left when they need it.
  • FARES AND TRAVEL: We have accepted in the past that Fares would be paid at a lower amount on RDO’s now they want to take it away altogether!
  • REPAIRS ALLOWANCE: Richard Langdon has made it clear that as he has put a water container with a hose running off it in each repairs truck Otis can now say they have met the requirements of amenities. What a joke. These blokes continually get filthy dirty on sites with no lunch rooms or toilets. He even suggested that they should go to university in order to find a job that has better conditions.
  • HOURS OF WORK FLEXIBILITY: Otis has been pushing this hard for many years. They currently have the ability to implement late starts but have refused to use the method agreed to previously. Instead they just run the mantra that the Victorians and Queenslanders agreed to it so we should. In both of those States there are provisions for the introduction of various shifts, with appropriate allowances, to cover calls. There has been no talk of that here. All the company has put on the table so far is “no mutual agreement” for service. Given that it was in their log of claims that they want it for all employees there is no doubt they will continue to push it for construction/mods in future agreements.
  • WAGES: The company is currently offering 3% but only if a number of changes are made to the agreement.

In Unity - Steve Bankes.

ETU & AMWU members working at Kone Elevators & Doors, Warners Bay have stepped up their dispute by taking a second round of industrial action in pursuit of an Enterprise Agreement. Last Friday members walked off the job for a second 4-hour stoppage that also included returning to the depot for lunch and not responding to weekend callouts.

Kone workers across the country are employed under enterprise agreements with the exception of Newcastle where workers are currently employed on substandard individual contracts.

After providing the company with a comprehensive draft agreement covering the employee’s log of claims three weeks ago Kone management continued with their stalling tactics. When a response was finally forthcoming from the company’s directors it fell well short of meeting expectations forcing Kone’s workers to initiate another round of industrial action.

ETU & AMWU members are determined to secure a classification structure, job descriptions, fair hourly rates and relevant allowances. To date Kone’s response has been a blunt “NO” to all employee claims.

Kone failed to respond with any counter offer but now claim they need an additional two weeks to develop a range of watered down provisions – all of which are likely to be unacceptable to their highly skilled and dedicated workforce.

“The claims developed and put forward by our members is not extraordinary or outrageous” said ETU Organiser Justin Page.

“All these workers want is to be covered by an Enterprise Agreement with similar conditions that other Kone employees already receive and enjoy.”

“Everywhere else across the country where Kone employ people they do so under an enterprise agreement, Newcastle is the exception and these workers are sick of being treated like second class employees.” said Justin.

AMWU Organiser Fergal Eiffe said that this dispute is not just about securing a fair agreement it’s about delivering equality to a dedicated and highly skilled workforce.

“These employees are highly skilled trades people that have worked tirelessly with unwavering commitment but they continue to be treated like second class employees by a management team that just don’t seem to get it.”

“Managements arrogance and actions have only strengthened these members resolve to secure an enterprise agreement that delivers similar pay and conditions to all other Kone workers across the country.” Fergal said.

Last week ETU members from across the Sydney Construction sector attended a mass meeting where a tough new approach to the construction and contracting sectors was unanimously supported by members.

ETU members said that the time had come to take a hardline approach with bosses in the construction sector to ensure ETU members retain hard fought conditions and secured good outcomes moving forward.

In a move that will see a million dollar campaign rolled out across the construction and contracting sectors, the ETU NSW has developed a five point campaign plan to tackle rouge bosses and secure good outcomes for members across the construction and contracting sectors. The five point plan includes:

  1. MAKE EMPLOYERS ACCOUNTABLE - The electrical contracting companies have had it too good for too long, it's time to make them more accountable.
  2. MORE RESOURCES - the ETU NSW has increased the number of organisers, we now have five full time organisers in the construction sector to fight for ETU members.
  3. ZERO TOLERANCE TO SAFETY BREACHES - Bosses who choose to skimp on safety will be our target as we clamp down on safety to protect workers.
  4. A TOUGHER APPROACH ACROSS CONSTRUCTION & CONTRACTING - its a tough industry so the ETU & our members are taking a tough new approach.
  5. STRONGER EBA's THAT PROTECT & IMPROVE CONDITIONS - You spoke and the ETU has listened. The ETU will only sign off on agreements that protect the rights of apprentices, our trade and our license.

This plan marks the beginning of the ETU's campaign and new approach but we can't do this without you. This commitment to the construction and contracting sectors from your union shows that we are serious about fighting for better outcomes.

At a time when the Sydney construction sector is booming it's time for electrical contracting companies to share this prosperity with their workers.

This is a new approach but it will only be successful with your support so get on board and let your organising team know what needs to be done to deliver better outcomes for ETU members.

Your ETU Organisers are:

In unity,

Steve Butler - ETU Secretary

In accordance with the requirements of the Fair Work Registered Organisation Act 2009 the CEPU Electrical Division, NSW Branch (the Branch) has made available to members the complete financial report and associated documents for 2015.

By law the Branch must provide a copy of their financial report to members, this can be downloaded from the members area after logging in. Click here to access the CEPU 2015 financial report.